<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The week in politics &#8211; special editior director&#8217;s cut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capenews.net/blogs/snark-infested_waters/2010/01/08/the-week-in-politics-special-editior-directors-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capenews.net/blogs/snark-infested_waters/2010/01/08/the-week-in-politics-special-editior-directors-cut/</link>
	<description>Where Netizens are our chum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bailey</title>
		<link>http://capenews.net/blogs/snark-infested_waters/2010/01/08/the-week-in-politics-special-editior-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capenews.net/blogs/snark-infested_waters/?p=499#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>What a painfully uninspired endorsement. Pete, could you perhaps offer something other than a superficial soundbite to explain why Brown is the superior candidate?

I could just as easily say &quot;We don&#039;t need another member of the Party of No blocking progress in the Senate&quot; but it truly says nothing about Coakley, and it reduces Brown to a stereotype...which may nevertheless be accurate, but I&#039;d be more convinced by a detailed argument than a high concept slogan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a painfully uninspired endorsement. Pete, could you perhaps offer something other than a superficial soundbite to explain why Brown is the superior candidate?</p>
<p>I could just as easily say &#8220;We don&#8217;t need another member of the Party of No blocking progress in the Senate&#8221; but it truly says nothing about Coakley, and it reduces Brown to a stereotype&#8230;which may nevertheless be accurate, but I&#8217;d be more convinced by a detailed argument than a high concept slogan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://capenews.net/blogs/snark-infested_waters/2010/01/08/the-week-in-politics-special-editior-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-2846</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capenews.net/blogs/snark-infested_waters/?p=499#comment-2846</guid>
		<description>Vote for Scott Brown. We do not need another big tax, spend and borrower in the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote for Scott Brown. We do not need another big tax, spend and borrower in the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
